Ghiberti's St. Matthew

The loss and recovery of lost wax casting

The bronze casting with the lost wax technique was lost with the fall of the Roman Empire, so much so that in the Middle Ages the sculpture was made exclusively in marble and stone, and the rare bronze doors were cast in Constantinople, where the Byzantines had retained, in part, the knowledge of this technique.
They were the first Florentine Renaissance artists to re-experiment the lost wax casting technique, helped at the beginning by Byzantine and Venetian artisans. And the first castings, even if of small and bas-relief pieces, came out with various defects, as can be seen in the panels of the Ghiberti’s Gates of Paradise, in which recast was carried out to repair lacks and gaps

A Renaissance lost wax casting, problematic and difficult

The church of Orsanmichele in Florence is dotted outside, in the lower part, with splendid niches in which large bronze and marble sculptures have been placed, each sponsored by one of the 14 Florentine “Arts”. Recently they have all been replaced by replicas and the originals are kept inside the second floor of the building, that is, in the Orsanmichele Museum

The “Art of Money Changers” of Florence commissioned to Lorenzo Ghiberti the one of its patron San Matthew in 1419: it had to be cast in bronze with the lost wax technique, 2.7 meters high, and cast in a single piece, that is with a single bronze pouring. Ghiberti, taking the gamble, accepted the challenge, but it went badly. It seems that the first cast was unsuccessful, and that Ghiberti had to carry out a second one at his own expense. However the story went, what is clear is that the statue that came to us was cast in two times: first the lower part, and then the upper part was poured back on top of the lower. That is, it was performed in two times and in two parts, but not by choice, but because the first cast was unable to complete the upper part of the large statue. Since the statue has arrived to us like this, it also means that it has been accepted by the client.

Restoration and replacement with a replica

The St. Matthew cast by Ghiberti was removed from the niche of the church of Orsanmichele and was taken to the Opificio delle Pietre Dure in Florence to proceed with its restoration.

The Galleria Bazzanti together with the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry offered to cast the replica of the large sculpture with lost wax technique at their own expense. It was precisely during the study phases, and then at the beginning of the execution of the negative mold, that it became clear that the statue was cast in two stages, with the upper part re-poured over the lower one

It started with the study of wich technique to use for the negative mould which obviously would have not damaged either the patina or the original bronze surface

) and immediately after with the execution of the negative mold in silicone and mother mould

From the negative molds thus made by the Ferdinando Marinelli Foundry, waxes were obtained, transformed into bronze with the lost wax technique. The casting was made in 4 parts (two for the body, the head and the hand with the Gospel) assembled and welded with the same bronze alloy.

The replica thus replaced the original with an inauguration ceremony

The replica was appreciated also by the authorities. The subsequent defections of the pigeons contributed to “antiquing” the patina.


The art of Lost Wax Casting

Part 1

The realization of bronze sculptures during ancient times has always been more complex and expensive than that of marble or stone sculptures. Bronze is a metal alloy whose components have been difficult to find in the past, therefore expensive. The Romans considered bronze to be precious and noble, so much so that it was used to cast coins

IV century B.C.

and mint them.

III century B.C.

And also the casting technique was complex, expensive and had high risks of bad success. Widely used in classical times (in ancient Greece there were foundries of semi-serial production), in the Middle Ages bronze sculpture became very rare. It was not until the early Renaissance that works of art through lost wax bronze casting began to be produced, a production that continued to this day.

Bronze is an alloy that is obtained by combining copper and tin in different percentages depending on the characteristics that the metal must have (the alloy obtained from copper and zinc is brass instead). While in the various eras the technique of lost wax casting has remained almost unchanged, for the alloy, that is for the percentages of copper and tin, many tests have been done, in some cases also with the addition in small quantities of other metals, to improve its smoothness during the casting or the mechanical characteristics: alloys for cannons (the bombarda alloy), the alloy for bells, and the statuary alloy used since the late Renaissance for sculptures and coin minting. Biringuccio, in the mid-sixteenth century,

recommends for casting figures a bronze with the percentage of tin variable from 7.4 to 10.7. In the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry the bronze Bz 90/10 is used, in which the percentage of tin is 10%

For the lost wax technique a lot of experience is needed: especially in the past mistakes in the composition of the refractory material, in the cooking of the forms, in the temperature in which the bronze was poured, could compromise the casting.

In the technique of lost-wax casting, materials, tools and machinery, have remained the same since the Renaissance till the mid-1900s. Only after this date some materials and some equipment have changed slightly to make the work of the foundry artisans safer and less tiring. But the technique remained exactly the same, linked to the hands of the craftsman.
(The black and white images refer to the Ferdinando Marinelli Foundry in the 1950s). The first phase of this technique is the execution of a negative mould over the sculptural work to be reproduced in bronze, such as a clay sculpture.

Getting a negative mold for an all-round sculpture with many undercuts creates difficulties; in antiquity it was used the molding with dowels where the mould was made in many small pieces of plaster called dowels, each detachable and extractable from the sculpture, parts held together by an external counter-shell also in plaster called motherform.

From the Renaissance, it began to be used an elastic substance obtained from animal glue mixed with fat, melted in a bain-marie and applied with a brush on the surface of the sculpture; this glue, as it cools, becomes hard but remains rather elastic and flexible, allowing the detachment from the sculpture even in cases of undercuts.


Donatello and the putto in the sculpture - Part III

Donatello from 1420 to 1440

Donato di Niccolò di Betto Bardi, known as Donatello, was born in Florence in 1386. He had a very long life, he died in Florence in 1466 at the age of 80 years.

He was educated in the house of the Martelli’s, very rich Renaissance lords who had made money as arms makers, then allied with the Medici family. He was noble and elegant, but this did not prohibit him in Pistoia from beating and seriously injuring the German Anichinus Pieri, for whom he was condemned.
It was probably in Pistoia that he worked as a goldsmith apprentice together with Brunelleschi for the great silver altar for the city’s cathedral.

The friendship with Brunelleschi was very important for Donatello; in fact they went together, from 1402 to 1040, to Rome to study and draw ancient Roman art. In 1404 he was back in Florence where until 1407 he worked as an aide to the first door (north) of the baptistery cast with lost wax by Ghiberti. From 1406 along with other sculptures for the city of Florence he worked at the Porta della Mandorla of the Florentin Cathedral and later with Jacopo della Quercia at the baptismal font of Siena. And in Orsanmichele with Nanni di Banco. He had the possibility to see the new typology of the type of classical Roman putto.
Between 1423 and 1425 he sculpted and cast the statue of Saint Louis of Toulouse commissioned by the Guelph Party for an external niche of Orsanmichele (Museum of the Opera of Santa Croce, Florence)

Donatello in the architecture of the marble niche sculpts two cherubs keeping a ribbon in his typical “stiacciato” bas-relief style, along with other cherub heads.

Donatello decorates the upper part of the pastoral stick of the saint with niches from which small putti stand out in the round and hold arms; although very small, they are the first bronze statuettes of the ‘400.

In the marble Madonna and Child in her arms sitting on the clouds, nine winged and half-naked putti-Eroti as angels (previously the angels were heavily dressed) are sculpted foreshortening with the “allo stiacciato” technique typical of Donatello, (Mus. Fine Arts Boston) performed between 1425 and 1428.

Even in another bas-relief in “stiacciato”, the Ascension and the handing over of the keys to St. Peter (Victoria & Albert Mus. London) which is believed to have been carved in the same period as the previous (1425-1428), there are small angels plump putti dressed in veil. Those at the top are classical,

those at the bottom, more adults, have more the appearance of angels.

The musician and dancing angels and the banquet of Herod are part of the baptismal font of the Baptistery of Siena, performed in collaboration between Ghiberti, Jacopo della Quercia, Turino di Sano, Giovanni Turini and Donatello. The Font was made between 1416 and 1427. In 1416 Ghiberti went to Siena, in 1417 he created a model on which to apply to the base bas-reliefs and all-round bronze figures. Two bas-reliefs were entrusted to Ghiberti (Baptism of Christ and Capture of the Baptist), two to Jacopo della Quercia (Expulsion of Zechariah from the Temple and the Banquet of Herod), two to Turino di Sano together with his son Giovanni Turini (The birth of the Baptist and the Baptist’s Prayer). In 1423 Jacopo had not yet begun to model of the Banquetof Erode, which was then given to Donatello, to whom two statues of the Virtues and two putti were also contracted. In 1427 Ghiberti and Donatello finished their bas-reliefs, and Jacopo began his own.
In 1428 the completion of the whole Font was allocated to Jacopo.
In his bas-relief of the Banquet of Herod Donatello he inserted the figures of two absolutely classic putti half naked with ancient clothes quite frightened and horrified by the spectacle of Giovanni’s head on the plate. It is the first time that putti are placed in the dramatic and horrible scene of the beheading of the Baptist.

The motif of the left leg of the putto in the ground is also of classical inspiration, probably from some ancient sculpture or an Etruscan cinerary urn, such as the one at the Vatican Museums of Thana Helusnei.

At the top of the Font there were originally 6 all-round bronze cherubs, only four remained, of which two by Donatello, executed in 1429, and two by Turini executed in 1431. Of the Donatello’s, one plays the horn, another one dances and plays the tambourine (Mus. Bode Berlin). Donatello has created here the dancing putto that derives from the angels (adults) musicians of the Middle Ages. They are the precursors of the cherubs of the choirs of Florence and Prato. They also have the characteristic of being autonomous, that is to say, once detached from the Font, small statues that do not require any background to exist, which anticipate the largest all-round sculptures of the Renaissance. They stand on a shell surrounded by a crown symbols of birth (baptism) and victory (on death).

The antipope Baldassarre Coscia Giovanni XXIII elected in 1410 died in Florence in 1419. Donatello together with Michelozzo designed and built his tomb inside the Baptistery of Florence.

On the base on which the sarcophagus rests, two naked winged putti holding a parchment with an inscription are carved in bas-relief. /p>

The use of pagan cherubs in the tomb of a pope makes us understand that at the beginning of the fifteenth century the figure of the putto-Erote had been serenely re-Christianized.
Below, three winged heads of cherubs hold wreaths.


Michelangelo and the marble quarries

Part II

The quarries of Serravezza - Pietrasanta

Michelangelo, as he himself wrote in March 1520, at the request of the pope, in 1517-8 left from Rome for the Serravezza quarries: “I was sent from Rome to Seraveza, before I started to quarry, to see if there was marble”.

But he goes on to get them from the Carrara quarries .
Finally, however, he persuades himself to have the marble extracted in Serravezza as the Pope asked him, with the appreciation of Cardinal Giulio dei Medici, a family who owns the quarries of Pietrasanta and Serravezza, who wrote to him in this regard on 23 March 1518. Cosimo I dei Medici will then build the Medici villa of Serravezza in these lands in 1564, probably by Buontalenti architect .

From a letter also written in March 1920 to Sebastiano del Piombo, Michelangelo, who has always been against the quarries of Searravezza, justifies this change by saying that he was no more satrisfied by the Carrara’s quarrie workes. So I went to get these marbles to be quarried in Seravezza owned by Florentine people.
And it certainly weighs on him having to open new virgin quarries, rather than using those very well-known of Carrara. Furthermore, the Carraresi boycotted the transport by sea of the blocks already purchased and quarried, so much so that Michelangelo was forced to resort to the recommendation of Jacopo Salviati to convince a ferryman from Pisa.
But Serravezza disappointed him: the marbles were not as he would had liked them, deliveries were very late, the road to reach them was not yet finished. Now Michelangelo was very angry, and on April 18, 1518 he wrote from Pietrasanta to his brother Buonarroto that he was desperate and that he would had ride on horseback and go to visit the Cardinal de ‘Medici and Pope telling them that he would leave return to Carrara, were the quarry workers where praying him to go back.
He actually returns to Carrara, but things have become enormously complicated there too: always higher prices for marble and infinite difficulties for transport. In Serravezza things where no better: the stonemasons, all from Settignano near Fiesole, had no experience in quarrying marble, they had continuously accidents in the quarry, one of which had been fatal, it was not possible to dig a healthy column without unexpected veins or without breaking it. He had to commission and pay some architectural pieces three times, he had to personally go and teach the inexperienced quarrymen the quality of the marble, as he wrote in the letter to Domenico di Boninsegni at the end of December 1518.
After a series of accidents also in the loading on ships, misunderstandings with the Marquis Alberico Malaspina,

Michelangelo commissioned blocks from the Carrara quarry workers, and communicated to Cardinal Giulio dei Medici that he had found these quarrymen more humble than they usually did. The pope temporarily renounced the plan to exploit the Serravezza quarries and accepted Carrara, as Michelangelo wished. Vasari, an artist at the service of the Medici, in his Dell ‘Architettura will be the only one who will praise the marbles of the Pietrasanta quarries, owned by the Medici.

Things continued to go slowly and Cardinal Giulio Della Rovere sended the papal secretary Pallavicino to Michelangelo’s studio in Florence, where he finded with satisfaction 4 statues sketched for the facade of San Lorenzo.
To check the supplies constantly delayed of the marble for the facade of San Lorenzo Michelangelo sended his disciple Pietro Urbano on horseback several times to the Carrara quarries together with an apprentice. Difficult task, because being able to identify microfractures in the blocks and even more to understand which direction they take within the block, was very difficult. So much so that even in the marble of the Pietà in Florence during the restoration one of these microfractures appeared, and in that of the Moses an evident small crack starts from the coat and crosses the right knee.
In his studio in via Mozza in Florence, Michelangelo, assisted by the Maestro Domenico di Giovanni di Bertino from Settignano called Topolino, continued the working of the marble for the facade. The foundations of the new facade where also carried out.
But in 1519-1520 the work on the facade was blocked: the pope no longer seemed interested, or perhaps also because of the lack of money (Vasari). Between February and March 1520 the contract was cancelled: Michelangelo was embittered, also because the real reason for the blocking of the works had not been told to him, and he writes that because of the infinite displacements for Carrara and Pietrasanta … I was on horseback eight months …
The marbles still in the quarries where purchased in part from Sansovino, in part they where sent to Naples for Vittorio Ghiberti (son of Lorenzo Ghiberti).
But soon Michelangelo was heartened: he received from Giulio dei Medici, the future Pope Clement VII, the task of designing the New Sacristy in San Lorenzo, to place the tombs of Lorenzo the Magnificent and his brother Giuliano, of Lorenzo duke of Urbino (seventh son of Lorenzo the Magnificent), and Giuliano Duke of Nemours (grandson of Lorenzo the Magnificent).

In 1521 he received 200 ducats from Cardinal Giulio and on 9 April he returned to Carrara to order the marbles for the tombs of the New Sacristy. He stayed there for about 20 days making the measurements of the burials and drawing them. He returned to the house of the quarryman Francesco Pelliccia, as usual in Carrara, ordered 200 cartloads of marble specified on the notary contract which he stipulated on April 23 with the quarrymen Pollina, Leone and Bello. On April 2, he signed another contract for 100 cartloads of marble with the quarrymen Marcuccio and Francione del Ferraro.
Since 1520 Michelangelo had designed various plans for the tombs, which he discussed with Cardinal Giulio. In 1524 he had created the definitive models that he began to sculpt. In 1526 the first tomb was walled in the chapel, that of Lorenzo Duke of Urbino with the statue of Lorenzo posing as a thinker and allegories of Aurora and Twilight.

Subsequently he sculpted, with the help of Montorsoli, that of Giuliano Duke of Nemours with allegories of Night and Day.
The events relating to the supply of marble from Carrara become tangled and complex, Michelangelo returned several times to Carrara, but was too busy in Florence and leaved his seconds to manage the extractions. But the work on the New Sacristy went on.
In 1527 following the crisis between Pope Clement VII of the Medici family and Emperor Charles V of Habsburg, the Florentine people, fomented by the friar Girolamo Savonarola, expelled the Medici from Florence by establishing a republican government. Michelangelo collaborated with the new government taking care of the fortifications. In 1530 Florence was besieged and surrendered in 1532, the republican government was replaced by the Medici lordship of Alessandro dei Medici, illegitimate son of Pope Clement VII.

On the return of the Medici, Michelangelo resumed work on the New Sacristy which continued until 1534, the year in which he went to Rome to fresco the Sistine Chapel.


Donatello and the putto in the sculpture - Part II

The Renaissance

On the left side of the Cathedral of Florence (Santa Maria del Fiore) there is the Almond Gate, executed in three phases: 1391-1397, 1404 -1409, 1414 -1422. Without going into the list of the artists who worked on it, it is enough to note that in the side friezes there are classical cherubs, some more clumsy, others more evolved. They are among the first “germs” of the rediscovery of the Eros-Love putto.

The first real appearance of putti in ancient style is owed to Jacopo della Quercia (with the probable help of Francesco da Valdambrino) in the tomb that he executed in 1406 for Ilaria del Carretto, wife of Paolo Guinigi lord of Lucca, placed in the Cathedral of the city. It is a sarcophagus still of medieval flavor, with the deceased on the lid. But the sarcophagus is surrounded by a series of classic winged putti, each in a different pose, which hold the classic fruit garlands around their necks. Even if they have funerary meaning, Jacopo for the first time recreates, on a classical Roman model, the one that with Donatello will be the Renaissance putto.

It is very likely that Jacopo was inspired by the various Roman sarcophagi and fragments of sculpture found in Pisa, some of which are decorated with putti,

others with garlands like that of Caius Bellicus Natalis Tabanianus of the Pisa Monumental Cemetery.

Jacopo also sculpted, between 1425 and 1438, two winged putti of classical forms inserted in two shelves of the Porta Magna of the church of San Petronio in Bologna,

and likewise two cherubs of classical taste in the bas-relief of Adam and Eve, representing Cain and Abel.

Another interesting example is found in the predella of the four sculptures of one of the niches of the church of Orsanmichele in Florence: the Santi Quattro Coronati by Nanni di Banco executed from 1411 to 1413: a marble sculpture workshop is represented in bas-relief; on the right, one is curiously performing a classic but very large putto, when in reality the sculpture of a large nude had never been performed yet; it will be no earlier than about 1440, the year in which Donatello performs the Attis and his David.

In the sacristy of the church of Santa Trinita in Florence, the tomb of Onofrio Strozzi consists of an arch that overlooks the sarcophagus; the arch is decorated with putti that climb on a garland in a bas-relief, whose style is very similar to that of Donatello. On the sarcophagus there are two ungainly and ugly putti that support a coat of arms, in the ancient Roman style. Probably it is to these that the document that attributes to Piero di Niccolò Lamberti the work, executed in 1418, refers to, while the arc was probably executed later by the workshop of Donatello.

Between 1415 and 1421, the year of his death, Nanni di banco worked on the execution of the high-reliefs of the upper part of the Porta della Mandorla of the Florentine Cathedral. The Madonna contained in the “almond” is surrounded by 6 winged putti who are dressed as angels, three of them musicians; they are more grown up than classic cherubs. Inside the almond, on the sides of the Madonna, two others appear, younger, and a winged putto head (a Serafino) also appears under his feet. It is a hybrid: dressed angels, with the typology and shape of classical Roman putti that surely influenced Donatello who already knew the classic ones seen in his travels to Rome with Filippo Brunelleschi.


Michelangelo and the marble quarries

Part I

Michelangelo reached the marble quarries in Carrara twice, in 1497 and 1503, but Condivi, who wrote the biography published in 1553, does not mention it.

In November 1497 he went there to find marble for the Pietà, a monument contracted by the cardinal of San Dionigi (Jean de Bilheres de Lagraulas), who wrote to the Elders of Lucca to help him on his arrival at the quarries.

Even before signing the contract with the client, Michelangelo withdrawed a sum from his account at the Archispedale of Santa Maria Nuova in Florence

and on a grey horse he left for Carrara, where he rented a house owned by the quarryman Francesco Pelliccia who worked in the Polvaccio quarry, where Michelangelo bought the blocks, and which today is called Michelangelo’s Quarry.

But he stayed there only the time he needed to find and choose the marbles at the quarry by the stonemason Matteo Cuccarello and returned to Rome; in early February they were ready, Michelangelo payed the rental of a cart pulled by a horse for their transport to the port, but did not return to Carrara: an acquaintance of the client, the cardinal of San Dionigi, was interested in the operation.
At the beginning of March the marbles had not yet arrived, Michelangelo was waiting for them.The cardinal wrote to the Marquis of Massa Malaspina and to the Lordship of Florence to untangle the situation, finally, at the beginning of the summer, the blocks arrived in Rome. In August the contract was signed between the two in which Michelangelo undertaked for 450 golden ducats to sculpt the Pietà as the cardinal’s funeral monument, taking on all the costs.
In August 1498 the sculpture was not yet finished, the cardinal died and did not have time to see it.

Michelangelo returned to the quarry in 1503, when the Opera del Duomo in Florence commissioned him to perform the twelve apostles for the Cathedral, forcing him by contract to go to Carrara to choose the marbles. He found almost all of them, as he himself will write in December 1523 to Giovan Francesco Fattucci:… chondocti la maggior parte d’i marmi…, which arrived in Florence between 1504 and 1505. It began with the “sbozzo” of the San Matteo that did not finish (Accademia Gallery, Florence) but stopped because Pope Julius II della Rovere wanted it in Rome, and in December 1505 the contract for the apostles was dissolved.

Condivi, in Michelangelo’s biography, tells us that in the spring of the same year he returned to Carrara. This time the commitment was important: looking for the marble for the huge tomb that the Pope wanted to erect in St. Peter’s was not a joke. He had to find many perfect blocks, worth more than a thousand ducats. And this time in Carrara it remained eight months. The first contract we have left of this long period in the quarries is dated November 1505 and is related to the transport by sea of 34 cartloads of marble: the cartload is the quantity of marble that a cart with two oxen can tow on the plain, about 850 kg.

It was stipulated with two Ligurian of Lavagna boat owners, who in about ten days transported the cargo to Avenza with the boats at the cost of 62 golden ducats, where Michelangelo would have unloaded and transported by sea to Rome at his own expense; they were unloaded at the Ripa del Tevere with boats (today Ripa Grande).

The second contract reached to us, dated 10 December 1505, concerns the purchase of another 60 cartloads of marble by the stonemasons Matteo Cuccarello and Guido di Antonio di Biagio who should have brought to the port of Carrara for embarkation between May and the following September.
In the contract Michelangelo specified that the marbles had to be white, without defects, that is without internal cracks, without veins, they had to be “alive” and not “cooked”, they had to be extracted from the Polvaccio quarry, or from any other place where they were found, provided that they were clean white and some of the blocks were not yet established, and Matteo Cuccarello had to go to Florence where Michelangelo gave them precise drawing also the shape of each block, as was his habit.

The quantity of marbles ordered is such that the various quarrymen in 1506 created a Company, today we would say a Joint Venture to satisfy the sculptor and the Pope. When all the marbles arrived they fill half of St. Peter’s square, with great admiration of the people and satisfaction of the Pope. The gigantic pyramid-shaped tomb 10 meters long and 7 meters wide would have cost 10,000 ducats and would have engaged Michelangelo for 5 years.

If Michelangelo had a temper, Julius II was no less:

he was convinced by Bramante, envious, that having the tomb while he was still alive would have brought bad luck, and blocked the payments requested by Michelangelo to pay the cost of transporting the marble; the sculptor went several times and for several days to the Pope who did not receive him. On April 18 the angry Michelangelo fleed on horseback towards Florence, Julius II asked to 5 papal couriers to chase him; they reached him in Poggibonsi and tried to get him back to Rome. But the sculptor disagreed, and payed the cost of transport with a loan from Jacopo Gallo’s bank.
The marbles remained in St. Peter’s square until the death of Julius II and the election of the subsequent Florentine Pope Leo X in 1513.
The heirs of Julius II asked Michelangelo to resume the work of carving the tomb, but with a less ambitious project. But this project had not peace, it was increasingly reduced in 1516, then in 1526 and again in 1532, when the mausoleum had not longer to be placed in San Pietro Basilica but in the Church of San Pietro in Vincoli. A subsequent project still shrinked it, and only in 1545 Michelangelo finished it in the shape and size it still has today.

In 1513, when the work for the Papal mausoleum restarted, Michelangelo’s relations with the quarrymen of Carrara were exacerbated, both for the delay in deliveries of the new blocks that should replace those stolen in St. Peter’s square, and, perhaps, for the unsatisfactory quality of the latest marbles. Or perhaps also for the delays in paying the quarrymen for the marble delivered in 1508. And he no longer wanted to deal personally with the Carrarese quarrymen: on July 7, 1515 Michelangelo wrote to his brother Buonarroto to ask the stonemason of Pietrasanta Michele da Settignano if he could buy marble from there, but he said he could not go in person or send someone: A Carrara non voglio andare io, perché non posso, e non posso mandar nessuno che sia el bisognio, perché se e’ non sono pazi e’ son traditori e tristi…
He also asked his brother to put him in contact with other people who could mediate between him and the Carraresi. Michelangelo returned to Carrara in 1516, when the project for the tomb of Julius II started again. He obtained a letter of recommendation for Lorenzo Malaspina marquis of Fosdinovo, sent to the marquis by his sister Argentina Malaspina, wife of Pier Soderini, perhaps solicited by Michelangelo himself; Soderini was a friend and admirer of Michelangelo.

The letter had a good effect, and he was well received by the quarrymen represented by the Caldana (Jacopo d’Antonino di Maffiolo) who sent him a letter in Florence in which he wrote that he was willing to serve him heartily.
In November 1516 he ordered marbles to Francesco Pelliccia, in whose house he continued to live as a tenant, but in April 1517 the order was canceled by mutual agreement. However, he continued to order marbles at the Polvaccio quarry from the quarrymen Mancino, Iacopo di Piero di Torano, and Antonio di Iacopo di Pulica; but they did not comply with the agreed agreements, and Michelangelo sued them in the curia of Carrara. Michelangelo, who did not know Latin, demanded and obtained that notaries would have written in the vernacular.
Let’s take a step back: in December 1516 while he was in Carrara, Pope Leo X wanted him in Rome to make him design the unfinished facade of the Florentine church of San Lorenzo; between 1516 and 1517 Michelangelo executed some different designs for the facade

with the Pope’s request, through Buoninsegni, to place the statues of San Lorenzo, San Giovanni, San Pietro and San Paolo in the lower niches; highered up the sitting one of San Luca, San Giovanni, San Matteo, San Marco; even higher those of San Cosma and San Damiano in honor of the Medici.
He also designed as usual, for the marbles he chose and ordered at the quarries for San Lorenzo, shape and size.

However, the Pope told him the idea that he wanted the marble to be quarried in Pietrasanta which was in the Medici domain. Michelangelo lost time because did not want to detach himself from the Carrara quarries, but the Pope did not withdraw: the marbles for San Pietro, Santa Reparata and San Lorenzo had to be quarried in Pietrasanta. With the excuse that the road to get to the quarries of Pietrasanta was not finished, Michelangelo continued to choose the marbles for the facade of San Lorenzo in Carrara, buying for 4,000 ducats. But he was not calm, he had the task of purchasing the marbles, but not that of executing the facade, and from Carrara he wrote to Domenico Boninsegni, the Pope’s secretary, expressing his concern. Boninsegni reassured him, told him that the Pope would have already wanted to see a model for the facade, which he was willing to wait for, but advised him to make a wooden one as soon as possible to send to Rome. On 20 August 1517 he left Carrara for Florence to make the model for the Pope, on which he applied the models of the sculptures made in wax. In Florence he felt seriously ill, but once recovered he performed it and sent it to Rome on a mule through his pupil Pietro Urbano.

The pope was enthusiastic, called and entrusted him for the realization of the facade; he knew well how the sculptor left everything unfinished and therefore obliged him to use helpers. On January 19, 1518 the contract was signed with white and fine marbles that were from Carrara or Pietrasanta where better [Michelangelo] would have judged in this regard.


Donatello and the putti in the sculptures - Part I

The Putti in history

In the history of Western art the ancestor of the Renaissance “putto” appears in Greece in the form of the young Eros, god of sexual love and desire, but also a divine principle that pushes towards beauty. He is the son of Aphrodite and Ares. It is already mentioned in the 8th century BC from Hesiod in “Theogony”; Euripides, in the fifth century BC, in “Medea” describes him as a creative and procreative force with the aspect of a beautiful and shining youth with golden wings. In addition to the wings it has the attributes as the bow and the arrows with which it pierces the soul and heart of humans, provoking desire.

In the Roman Pantheon it becomes the god called Amor or Cupidus with the same attributes of Eros, sometimes it also has a torch, a marriage symbol. Apuleius in the Golden Donkey (2nd century AC) still describes him as a beautiful winged young man.

A naked and winged young man who extinguishes a torch on the dying man’s chest is, in some Roman sarcophagi, the spirit of death (Roman sarcophagus with the myth of Prometheus, Prince Cammillo Panphili collection, from: Admiranda Romnarum Antiquitatum, Roma 1691).

But over the years the Eros-Cupid have been rejuvenated, not only, but in Hellenistic and Roman art there is also a swarm of Cupids that keep company to the Gods and that go to decorate architectural parts and sarcophagi, Pompeian frescoes, gems and seals, with or without wings. We are approaching the putto model that will be resumed at the beginning of the ‘400.

The bronze of Eros Dormiente from the 2nd century BC (Metropolitan Museum of art in New York) shows the typology that inspired the Renaissance sculptors: the child is very young, plump, with small wings of feathers, with curly and tousled hair.

Another model for the artists of the 15th century was also the marble sculpture of the 2nd century BC, now in the Uffizi Gallery, which was in the collections of Lorenzo il Magnifico.

A further example of a putto was that which strangles the goose, a Roman copy (110-160 AD) of an Hellenistic original sculpted by Beithos of Calcedonia (Musei capitolini, Roma). An example in lost wax cast bronze from the mold executed on the original is also present at the Bazzanti Gallery of Florence.

Bronze casting in limited edition from original mould at Galleria Bazzanti, Firenze

In the art of the Eastern Roman Empire born in the 5th century, which later became Byzantine art, the putti go out of fashion and are not used as Christian symbols: they tend to disappear. A rare exception is the famous ivory Veroli Casket at the British Museum dating back to around the year 1000.

Early Christianity transforms Eros-Cupid into a tutelary spirit assigned to each child (the future guardian angel), but in the paintings of the catacombs and in the decorations of the early Christian churches, putti appear that harvest and make wine, thus transformed into Eucharistic symbols of immortality.

Famous are those of the great porphyry sarcophagus of Constantina, wife of Constantine, from 354 AC (Vatican Museum).

The Greek daemon, messenger of the gods that brings the news to men, joins the concept of genius that accompanies man during his life. Apuleius in De Deo Socratis of the 2nd century AC writes that the soul of man is the daemon, called genius in alive, and lemur in the dead. Later on Christianity moves away from paganism trying to make its components negative and diabolical, especially if related to sex. The daemon becomes an evil spirit linked to black magic and to the devil. The god Pan (who became for the Romans Silvanus and approached to satyrs), for example, god of the woods and pastures that was often represented as Dionysus and Priapus with great sexual attributes,

was transformed into the devil, to whom the same attributes were attributed: horns, animal face, part of the body with animal hair, goat legs, small tail, large animal phallus.
In the Middle Ages Cupid loses its classical form, Christian art and literature move away from that influence of the Hellenistic mystery religions of early Christianity which had allowed the putti to appear, in the classical form, in the harvests of the catacombs and the sarcophagus of Constantine. The erotic image of Cupid becomes unacceptable for the church, which begins to depict it as an emanation of the devil, its appearance loses its joy and becomes sinister: no longer a child but transformed in the 14th century into a devilish animal-legged; we see him in this guise in the fresco of Giotto in the Basilica of Assisi (1325) in which appears with the writing his name “Amor”.

His assistant Pietro Lorenzetti, in the Last Supper and in the Flagellation of Christ, paints at the top some winged monochrome putti with a sinister appearance that they hold strange animals and objects (rabbit, fish, cornucopias).

In the façade of the Romanesque Cathedral of Modena, in 1170 Maestro Wiligelmus sculpted a cupid in forms that were no longer classical, with his legs crossed and leaning on the upside-down torch, and was accompanied by an ibis, a negative bird in that he represented in the medieval bestiaries the “carnal man”.

In the Courteus novels and poems of the Troubadours Eros-Cupid disappears: in the Breton Cycle novels (mid-13th century) the author Cretien de Troyes describes the arrows of love from which his characters are struck, but the archer-eros is never see. But finally in the fourteenth century love also began to be considered a positive force, Dante with Beatrice, Petrarca with Laura; Dante, in the Vita Nova writes that love is not a divinity, but a passion of the human mind.


The beginning of Renaissance sculpture: Donatello's David

The fifteenth century, the beginning of the Renaissance, is a founding moment of Western culture, whose principles, philosophy and art are marked up to the present day.
In this century a group of brilliant characters are born in Florence in all human knowledge: science, astronomy, philosophy, literature, humanism, esotericism, everything finds a new breath thanks to them. Even today no one has been able to explain why so many geniuses were born in this historical period and all in one region, Tuscany.
One of these characters is Donato Niccolò di Betto Bardi, known as Donatello, Florentine and sculptor

Portrait of Donatello from the 16th century (anonymous) – Louvre Museum

He is a friend of Brunelleschi,

Portrait of Brunelleschi, by Masaccio, S. Pietro in Cattedra, Cappella Brancacci, Florence

another great innovator in the various fields of art, and he goes to Rome with him to study ancient monuments: the two wandered around the city digging the ancient ruins, measuring and drawing the remains of classical buildings and the Roman people thought that they were two treasure seekers. The treasure for them were those remains.
After the first few works still in late Gothic style, Donatello broke away completely from the medieval taste, returning to sculpture in a classical Roman style, but more elegant and sensual, helping to create the “Renaissance style” in sculpture.
He also attended Michelozzo, skilled in lost wax bronze casting, from whom he learned this technique.

Fra Angelico, Deposition from the Cross, San Marco Museum, Florence

One of his most important masterpieces is the bronze David,

Bargello Museum, Florence

of surprising originality and innovative strength. The iconography given by Donatello to this masterpiece is undoubtedly different from the traditional one referring to the Bible: in addition to nudity, David wears an elegant hat that brings him closer to Mercury and beautiful chiseled shoes, attributes that were embellished by gilding, gone lost. Nudity, pose and accessories make this masterpiece very sensual, and this is a new vision of sculpture born in Florence during the Renaissance.
We do not have much information about this bronze; one comes from a letter that the Renaissance chronicler Marco Parenti wrote from Florence to Filippo Strozzi the Elder, who was in Naples.

Marco Parenti was a wealthy business owner in the silk sector, born in Florence in 1421; he had the intelligence to marry Caterina, daughter of the very wealthy banker Simone Strozzi, and he retired from business. He participated in Florentine cultural life by attending humanistic circles with Leon Battista Alberti. He wrote the “Historical Memories” related to the political affairs of Florence.

And a long series of letters, almost all sent to Filippo Strozzi.

In one of these, he reports that on the occasion of the wedding of Lorenzo the Magnificent with Clarice Orsini, the column supporting Donatello’s David was placed in the courtyard of the Palazzo Medici in Via Larga (now Via Cavour). The date of the marriage is 1469. This is the first “post quem” date we have concerning the David.
The dating of the work is obtained considering that Donatello in the early 1400s went again to Rome to study classical ancient sculpture, and that from 1443 to 1445 he was working in Northern Italy. So the period in which Donatello performed David shrinks from 1433 to 1454. In this range of years Donatello executed three other sculptures very close stylistically to the David: the Attis (Bargello Museum)

and the two “goblins”, now at the Musee Jacquemart Andree in Paris,

performed for the cornice of the Cantoria by Luca della Robbia for the Duomo of Florence, completed in 1438 (Museo dell’Opera del Duomo).

At Villa Carducci di Legnaia (Florence), in the cycle of illustrious women and men,

between 1448 and 1450, Andrea del Castagno painted the fresco portrait of Farinata degli Uberti (now in the Uffizi), which has the same pose as the legs and arms of David, evidently copied from it. So the scissor narrows again, becoming from 1433 to 1448.

The most accepted hypothesis is that Donatello executed the model and the fusion around 1440.
We have seen that the David was placed on a column in the center of the courtyard of Palazzo Medici Riccardi;

we know that the inscription that Cosimo the Elder asked to Gentile de ’Becchi, the first pedagogue of Lorenzo and Giuliano, sons of Piero il Gottoso, to write on the column in Latin: Victor est quisquis patriam tuetur / Frangit immanis Deus hostis iras / En puer grandem domuit Tirannum / Vincite cives!
This epigraph shows us that the Medici wanted to give the David, (the young shepherd who kills the powerful and overbearing enemy Goliath) exposed in their house an important moral and political message with a clear anti-tyrannical meaning; the message was that the presence of the Medici in Florentine politics guaranteed the repression of any attack on democracy, wherever it came from. And this was the policy of the Medici: to command the city but indirectly, through other people loyal to them, making the city believe in maintaining a democratic regime (not long after, instead, Cosimo I of the other branch of the Medici family will become dictator, with the title of Duke, then of Grand Duke).

Portrait of Bronzino, Uffizi

It is very probable that the work was committed to Donatello by Cosimo the Elder himself,

Portrait of Bronzino, Uffizi

that he would have first exhibited in his Casa Vecchia, and later in the Medici palace designed for him by Michelozzo.

Giovanni da Castro was a businessman connected both to the Medici family and to the Curia of Rome. He discovered the Tolfa alum quarries that made it unnecessary to buy the alum from the Turks, infidels and mainly skilled traders. And in fact, in the wake of the biblical David that kills Goliath, he made write the Psalmum in Christianorum hostem Turchum on a code that he donated, before 1469 to Cosimo the Elder, where the Turks are considered as invading heretics and enemies of Christianity, conquerors in 1453 of Constantinople. In the miniature of this code the Donatello’s David is painted, but covered with a little tunic to make it less risqué.

The column on which the David rested had been made by Desiderio da Settignano around 1458, and was about two meters high,

That the sculpture was made by Donatello to stand up high and then to be seen from below is confirmed, by his gaze facing down,

and also by a series of anatomical forcing studied according to the point of view of the observer placed much lower than the sculpture: the shoulder blades fell the same as the buttocks, the broken and flattened lower back, the angular joints; moreover the head of the Goliath is bent so as to make visible from below the trapezoidal plaque of the Goliath helmet with the cart of the goblins.

Seen from the current base

Seen in the original position

And there are also some areas of the bronze that Donatello has not refined that could not be seen from the bottom, thanks to the protrusion of the base garland. The head of the Goliath seen today at the height in which it is the David at the Bargello gives a very different impression when viewed from the bottom upwards: the feeling of a dead and fairly harmless thing becomes, when viewed from below, threatening.
And even the positioning of the upper body made his nudity less striking. Nudity that Donatello had the courage to exalt in his work in years when no one had dared to do so. So much so that the many David of the second half of the 1400s show this biblical character always covered with tunics, as also in the code of Giovanni da Castro.

We will have to wait until the sixteenth century with Michelangelo to see another completely naked David.

It has been hypothesized that the original column of Desiderio da Settignano on which the David was placed in the Palazzo Medici in Via Larga, had at its base four white marble harpies and the stem of red porphyry. Specialized technicians have reproduced this artefact inside the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry.

Under construction in the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry

currently at the Bazzanti Gallery in Florence.

For the presentation and inauguration of the Donatello’s David after the long restoration, the Bargello Museum in Florence has borrowed from the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry a bronze copy of the David made on the negative mold taken on the original of the the Marinell’s Foundry gipsoteca. This bronze was gilded by the Bargello technicians exactly like
it was the original before losing the gold,

and ha been placed on the model of the reconstructed column next to the original. It has been thus possible to see, for the first time, as it appeared in the fifteenth century, in the courtyard of the Medici, the David seen from below.


The Cacciucco Fountain

From a letter of 25 June 1626, which the Camerlengo Lorenzo Usimbardi wrote to Grand Duke Ferdinando II de ‘Medici …appears that Pietro Tacca declares that is convenient to cast two fountains to be put on the sides of the big monument of Ferdinando I dei Medici with the 4 black prisoners, and so is needed to give orders in this direction.

In 1621 the Grand Duke commissioned Pietro Tacca to make models and bronze castings of four chained black prisoners to add to the base of the statue he commissioned in 1595 in Carrara marble from the sculptor Giovanni Bandini and placed in the dock of Livorno in 1601 (current piazza Micheli).

The monument would have represented the victory of the Order of Saint Stephen over the Barbary corsairs, that is, over the Muslim, North African and Ottoman pirates, the most famous and cruel of which was known as Barbarossa. The Order was founded by Pope Pius IV in the second half of the ‘500 at the insistence of Cosimo I de’ Medici who was appointed Grand Master, and the title was passed to his successors. It was a similar pirate order, but Christian.

Pietro Tacca inherited the foundry of Giambologna in 1606, where he had worked from 1592. In 1620 at the request of Cosimo II de’ Medici he executed the negative mold of the Hellenistic marble boar in the Uffizi to cast a bronze replica, the famous that was missing on the original marble. He cast it in 1633.

From a letter dated 6 October 1627 of the Provveditore Leonardo Guidotti we know the estimated cost by Tacca for the execution of the two fountains: “as for the two fountains, the Tacca says that in each of them there will be an expense of 200 scudi in making the stone place where to put it; for the balustrade and for all the marbles 400 scudi. To make the two basins, the top monsters and other ornaments 700 ducati of bronze for each one; scudi 126 for the costs of the work; scudi 400 each that means scudi 800 for both. Having received the favorable opinion of the Grand Duke, in 1627 Tacca, with the help of his pupils Bartolomeo Salvini and Francesco Maria Bandini, began the execution of the models for the two fountains to be placed on the sides of the monument of the 4 Black Prisoners in the Livorno dockyard, and which were to be used to supply water to the ships that arrived there.

 
But at this point a strange thing happened, described by Filippo Baldinucci in his “Notizie de’ Professori di Disegno da Cimabue in qua” of 1681: [Ferdinand II declared that] … every work that [the Tacca] was going to conduct should be paid to him … which was then always practiced, particularly in the two metal fountains destined to be located on the Livorno dock … to make water for the ships, to which having, for reasons unknown to us, strongly opposed, and against the taste of the Tacca, Andrea Arrighetti that was the administrator of the fortresses and superintendent of the factories … And so fountains never arrived in Livorno.

 
Despite the reasons unknown to us of Baldinucci it is plausible to believe that the two fountains with those minimum jets of water and also their position were completely unsuitable to allow sailors to load the large barrels of the ships in an acceptable time, and they also took up too much space on the dock compared to the service they would do. Today we would say that they were not at all “functional”, and were replaced by normal fountains, as can be seen (to the right of the 4 Mori monument) in the engraving of 1655 of the Livorno Port by Stefano della Bella.

Pietro Tacca died in October 1640, but the foundry, formerly of Giambologna, continued its work with his son Ferdinando Tacca. The execution of the two fountains slowed down, but did not stop at all: we have news of payments to the Tacca’s for the fountains from 1639 to 1641. The payments probably related also to the placement of the two fountains in Piazza Santissima Annunziata in Florence, inaugurated on June 15th 1641 as Francesco Settimanni writes in his Memories of Florence: the two bronze fountains placed on the square of the Santissima Annunziata, works by Pietro Tacca, were discovered for the first time.
They were engraved in the view of Piazza SS. Announced by Zocchi in the mid-1700s, and by Vascellini in 1777.

The sculpture of the first half of the XVII century was influenced a lot from the late XVI century Mannerist style, especially from that of Bernardo Buontalenti; famous in Florence his Sprone Fountain put in place probably in 1608 when the whole area was decorated on the occasion of the passage of the wedding procession of Cosimo II de’ Medici with Maria Maddalena of Austria (of which the Galleria Bazzanti owns a small model), just as the four Season’s Statues were placed at the corners of the Ponte a Santa Trinita by the sculptors Francavilla, Landini and Caccini.

The style of the fountains, the same except for some details, that comes from the passion of wonderful and unusual forms found in nature, started in the XVI century in architecture and gardens (as in that of Villa Lante in Bagnania near Viterbo),

in the various collections of the European Lords, in the creation of the wunderkammer and in the invention of masks and monsters by Buontalenti and his school.

These were the years in which the princes of Europe competed to collect natural wonders and monstrosities that they kept in their studios in order to amaze their guests. Alchemy is also in fashion, whose laboratory is well hidden and protected from prying eyes, as is the Studiolo of Francesco I in Palazzo Vecchio. The choice to create sea monsters and fishes was evidently wanted by Tacca thinking of its location in the port of Livorno, on the sea, while it is even more original in a square like that of the SS. Annunziata. When Tacca modeled the fountains he was most probably inspired, for the fish garlands on the bases, by that of the rectangular basin of the Fountain of the Animals in the cave of the Medici Villa of Castello, sculpted by Tribolo in the middle of the XVI century.

The two Florentine monuments underwent cleaning and restoration in November 1745 by order of the Grand Duke Ferdinand III de’ Medici. Another restoration more than two centuries later, in 1988.

It is said that the city of Livorno has been offended since the VII century for not having had the two Tacca’s fountains. And that this “rudeness” is weighed on the Livornese people for about three centuries. In 1956, for the 350th anniversary of the appointment of the first Gonfaloniere of the city of Livorno, the Municipality of Florence wanted to donate a faithful copy to the city. Livorno thanked and said: we want two of them as in Florence, and we pay for the second! As happens in all the municipalities of Italy, problems and arguments arose about where to place them, etc.

At the beginning of the 1960s, the Municipality of Florence procured the negative mould performed on the original and gave it to the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry in Florence for performing castings of the two monuments.

Thus it was that in 1964 the two fountains arrived in Livorno.

And they were immediately nicknamed “the fountains of Cacciucco by the Leghorn population. Cacciucco is a kind of thick fish soup that is prepared only in a brief touch of the Tyrrhenian coast, from Versilia to Livorno. And it’s delicious!

The Bazzanti Gallery owns a replica of the Tacca fountain among its monuments, and a precious reduced model.


The two Ferdinands

The Pietro Bazzanti Gallery in Florence was purchased by the Marinelli family in 1960, family that owns the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry in Florence. And it is thanks to the “two Ferdinands”, as it is narrated below, that the Foundry and the Gallery met and joined.
Ferdinando Marinelli Senior went down, at the beginning of the 20th century, from Umbria to Florence when he was a young boy, to learn about the art of lost wax-casting that he then learned in foundries which, starting with Giambologna, went from father to son.

In 1919 he took over the Gabellini foundry of Rifredi (Florence), transforming it into the Ferdinando Marinelli Artistic Foundry

He married Delia Gelli from whom he had two sons, the eldest of whom, Marino,

will continue with his brother Aldo the melting activity. Marino married Renee Naylor, and in 1949, shortly after Ferdinando Marinelli Sr. together with his wife Delia were at the thermal Baths of Montecatini,

Ferdinando Marinelli Jr. was born.

In 1976 Marino died, and the Foundry passed to Ferdinando Jr.

The Foundry was run by Ferdinando Sr. in a patriarchal manner, almost a large family and hovered in an atmosphere of a Renaissance workshop.

Ferdinando Jr. very often visited the foundry, enchanted by the work of the artisans, and as every child is able to do, he learned on the fly without realizing those ancient techniques. And the materials were beautiful and strange and with mysterious names, the plaster, the cat powder (ground alum), the soap mixed with oil, the red wax, the “loto” (fireclay), the sulfur liver, the lacquer of the Angels.

To create negative molds was used a strange gum that became semi-pasty in a bain-marie and that smelled tremendously, obtained by mixing the rabbit bone jelly with glycerin: the silicone resins were invented twenty years later. The wax that was brushed inside these negative mold was wax of bees (the paraffin suitable for this type of work did not exist yet), and sent a very good sweet smell.

Ferdinando Jr. had some difficulty in understanding that strange three-dimensional network of wax sticks with which the wax sculptures were imprisoned,

and why they were locked up in that refractory material they called “loto”, that means mud

and then left to cook for a long time day and night in those strange stoves which were built with bricks and clay directly above the lotus forms.

The bronze melting and casting was an almost sacred act, it was difficult for him to assist, and when it happened he had to stay still and good on one side, otherwise they would have given him a kick in his ass. The oven was a hole in the ground filled with coal with a fan that blew continuously, into which the crucible filled with bronze ingots was inserted. It took a few hours for the metal to melt. The casting was performed by hand, raising the crucible with inside more than 200 kg. of metal at about 1000 centigrades pouring it with precision inside the forms. Ferdinando Jr, had to stay at a distance because if one of the four workers holding the crucible had slipped, the mass of melted and incandescent metal would have splashed everywhere.

The molds of “loto” with the bronze statues just poured inside were split by hammer to extract the castings.

And then there were the bronze workers, some with green hair due to the copper contained in the bronze, each one was a character, jealous of their chisel engravers.

When the welders lit up the cigarettes held between their lips with the oxyacetylene flame to weld, Ferdinando Jr. ran away, convinced that they would have volatilized also their nose.

In 1976, when his father Marino died, Ferdinando Marinelli Jr. also became the owner of Galleria Bazzanti, which, in addition to sculpting his famous marbles in his studios in Carrara and Pietrasanta, sold bronze sculptures cast in the Foundry, in particular the replicas of the Ancient and Renaissance classics, of which he possesses the negative molds executed in the past on the originals by Ferdinando Marinelli Sr.